In Re Wechsler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there was “no reason to destroy” the evidence where the noncustodial party “had already committed to paying the additional storage costs” that led to the initial need to destroy
• finding no monopolistic power where boat owners were free to accept or reject slip rental agreement and could have moored their vessels at a different marina
• finding no monopolistic power where boat owners were free to accept or reject slip rental agreement and could have moored their vessels at a different marina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).