In Re Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he panel must consider the evidence presented with respect to aggravating and mitigating circumstances and determine how much weight to assign to each in arriving at an appropriate discipline.”
• where the respondent attorney was held to be subject to the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct, even for conduct allegedly committed by the respondent 'when he was not acting as an attorney'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Kline
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-10-18· cited 39×
• In re Mintz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-02-07· cited 25×
• In Re Woodring
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-26· cited 10×
• In re Harrington
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-01-11· cited 9×
• In re Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-04-15· cited 8×
• In re Barker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-04-11· cited 7×
• In re Hall –
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-09-02· cited 5×
• In re Walsh (
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-09-29
• In re Hodge - (
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-12-29
• Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Unnamed Attorney
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2013-12-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Lober
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 64×
• In Re Comfort
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-08· cited 42×
• In Re Kershner
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-02-28· cited 18×
• In Re Arnold
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 10×
• In re Easteep
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-12-08· cited 5×