Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/8/2007

In Re Comfort

Citations

159 P.3d 1011
284 Kan. 183
2007 Kan. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that disciplining an attorney for publication of a demand letter did not violate the First Amendment
applying relaxed vagueness standard for business regulation in lawyer disciplinary proceeding resulting in public censure
denying vagueness and overbreadth challenges to attorney disciplinary provisions that used words with commonly understood meanings and that regulated conduct, not speech
“A lawyer’s right to free speech is tempered by his or her obligation to both the courts and the bar, an obligation ordinary citizens do not undertake.”
every potentially applicable ABA Standard need not be discussed by hearing panel or court; ABA Standards serve only as guidelines to assist courts in selecting appropriate and uniform discipline
every potentially applicable ABA Standard need not be discussed by hearing panel or court; ABA Standards serve only as guidelines to assist courts in selecting appropriate and uniform discipline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, Marquardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Comfort

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.