District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/26/1997
In Re Vance
Citations
- 697 A.2d 42
- 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 142
- 1997 WL 349891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming adjudication of summary contempt based on threatening manner of defendant's gestures
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Steadman, Belson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-10-30· cited 21×
- Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-03-21· cited 12×
- In Re WarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-10· cited 11×
- Jones v. HarknessDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-09· cited 8×
- Shirley Weidt v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2013-11-19· cited 7×
- In re A.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-08-21· cited 6×
- Rogers v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-12-09· cited 4×
- Banks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-14· cited 2×
- In Re ABDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-08-21
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-26· cited 126×
- Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-12-22· cited 33×
- Matter of GorfkleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-04-06· cited 32×
- Irby v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-07-03· cited 30×
- Bethard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-11-10· cited 20×
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-03-13· cited 13×
- In Re KrautDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-04· cited 12×
- McCormick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-27· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.