Skip to main content
· 10/4/1990

In Re Kraut

Citations

  • 580 A.2d 1305
  • 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 252
  • 1990 WL 146069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that where trial court listed three specific grounds for finding of contempt, and record failed to support one listed ground, this court would not presume other two grounds — even if legally sufficient — would have caused trial court to find defendant in contempt
  • reversing where trial court based single count of contempt on three grounds and evidence was insufficient as to at least one ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferren, Steadman, Kern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.