In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting expert economic testimony that certain evidence was “not consistent with the existence of a price-fixing conspiracy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Delta/Airtran Baggage Fee Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. Georgia· 2017-03-28· cited 12×
• Gillon v. Bernstein
  D. New Jersey· 2016-11-03· cited 10×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• United States v. John W. Downing
  Third Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 627×
• In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation
  Third Circuit· 1990-11-23· cited 458×
• David Oddi v. Ford Motor Company
  Third Circuit· 2000-10-13· cited 419×
• Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.
  Third Circuit· 2008-03-24· cited 393×
• Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1997-12-12· cited 373×
• ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton Corporation
  Third Circuit· 2012-09-28· cited 267×
• In Re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation Mdl
  Third Circuit· 2004-09-29· cited 242×
• In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 192×
• In Re Publication Paper Antitrust Litigation
  Second Circuit· 2012-08-06· cited 70×
• TC Systems Inc. v. Town of Colonie, New York
  N.D. New York· 2002-07-19· cited 52×
• Kleen Products LLC v. International Paper
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-03-26· cited 19×
• In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-01-26· cited 11×