Skip to main content
· 9/25/2009

In Re Union Pacific Railroad

Citations

  • 294 S.W.3d 589
  • 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1273
  • 2009 Tex. LEXIS 725
  • 2009 WL 3052432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “manner and method that Union Pacific employs to calculate and arrive at shipping rates” constitutes trade secret in part because disclosure would give competitors “a pricing advantage” over Union Pacific
  • applying factors and holding “Union Pacific’s affidavits establish trade secret protection under the Restatement factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.