In Re Continental General Tire, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that Rule 507 “clearly contemplates a heightened burden for obtaining trade secret information” that is more than merely showing the information is relevant.
• holding that appeal was an inadequate remedy when requesting party failed to establish necessity, yet the trial court nevertheless compelled production of trade secrets
• holding that appeal was an inadequate remedy when requesting party failed to establish necessity, yet the trial court nevertheless compelled production of trade secrets
• holding that, without evidence of necessity, requesting party did not carry its burden for compelling disclosure of trade secret
• holding that, without evidence of necessity, requesting party did not carry its burden for compelling disclosure of trade secret
• holding that plaintiff in defective-tire case, who was clear ly not in competition with defendant tire manufacturer, was not entitled to discover manufacturer’s trade secrets absent a showing of necessity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).