In re Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a suspension imposed by a federal bankruptcy court as a result of the same conduct involved in the disciplinary action does not qualify as a mitigating factor in determining the appropriate discipline
• six-month suspension for knowing and intentional violations ofRules 5.3 (d) and 5.5 (a) involving 26 different clients
• six-month suspension for knowing and intentional violations of Rules 5.3 (d) and 5.5 (a) involving 26 different clients

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Woodham
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-02-16· cited 16×
• In re Franklin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-04-26· cited 4×
• In re Johnson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-15· cited 2×
• In THE MATTER OF ROBERT MALLORY CRAWFORD (Two Cases)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-09-19· cited 1×
• in the Matter of John Floyd Woodham
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-02-16
• in the Matter of Mary Ellen Franklin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-04-26

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Ortman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-04-18· cited 35×
• In Re Skandalakis
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-11-07· cited 28×
• In Re Stubbs
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-06-15· cited 13×
• In Re Ellison
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-10-09· cited 9×
• In Re Levin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-04-26· cited 9×
• In Re Geary
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-01-22· cited 7×
• In Re Kakol
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-02-01· cited 4×
• In re Randolph
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-05· cited 3×
• In re Maxwell
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-02-27· cited 3×
• In re Sossomon
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-23· cited 3×
• In Re Bach
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-05-07· cited 2×