In re Maxwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Maxwell was sanctioned by the federal district court but not mentioning that fact in listing the factors “appropriately considered in mitigation”
• stating that Maxwell was sanctioned by the federal district court but not mentioning that fact in listing the factors “appropriately considered in mitigation”
• six-month suspension for recording an interview with adverse parties and delivering an edited transcript to adverse counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Tucker
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-06-16· cited 8×
• In re Adams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-15· cited 7×
• in the Matter of John B. Tucker
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-06-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Vaughn
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-06-24· cited 4×
• In Re Trauffer
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 4×
• In re Wyatt
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-09-30· cited 2×