· 6/4/2001
In Re Towne Services, Inc. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 184 F. Supp. 2d 1308
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9065
- 2001 WL 1250097
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s contention that omitted information was not of sufficient magnitude to require disclosure; “[t]his obviously is a fact-sensitive issue”
- “an existing problem at the time [of] the [misstatement] renders the no-hindsight cases inapplicable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.