Skip to main content
· 6/4/2001

In Re Towne Services, Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 184 F. Supp. 2d 1308
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9065
  • 2001 WL 1250097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s contention that omitted information was not of sufficient magnitude to require disclosure; “[t]his obviously is a fact-sensitive issue”
  • “an existing problem at the time [of] the [misstatement] renders the no-hindsight cases inapplicable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.