In Re Toro-Arcila

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that rendering portions of a statute to be “meaningless sur-plusage ... violates a basic tenet of statutory interpretation”
• discussing § 362(c)(4)(B) as applied to debtors who have only filed one case in the preceding 1-year period
• single- repeat filer moved to impose the stay within the thirty days and the Court granted the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).