D. Maryland· 8/28/2012
In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 284 F.R.D. 328
- 2012 WL 3711890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The final element Plaintiffs will have to prove at trial is that they suffered ‘measurable damages.’” (quoting In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552 F.3d 305, 311 (3d Cir. 2008))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Quinton Brown v. Nucor CorporationFourth Circuit· 2015-05-11· cited 131×
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationD. Maryland· 2013-08-26· cited 40×
- Wonasue v. University of Maryland Alumni Ass'nD. Maryland· 2013-06-14· cited 31×
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2014-04-09· cited 12×
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-01-26· cited 11×
- Standard Petroleum Co. v. Faugno Acquisition, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-08-28· cited 10×
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-11-12· cited 10×
- In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-11-22· cited 9×
- In re Delta/Airtran Baggage Fee Antitrust LitigationN.D. Georgia· 2016-07-12· cited 4×
- Castro v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc.D. New Jersey· 2015-09-30· cited 1×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,269×
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 921×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2001-10-17· cited 451×
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court· 1963-01-21· cited 409×
- Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Third Circuit· 1997-08-27· cited 283×
- Texaco Inc. v. DagherSupreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 271×
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1998-08-19· cited 243×
- Cordes & Co. Financial Services v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Second Circuit· 2007-09-11· cited 215×
- Gariety v. Grant Thornton, LLPFourth Circuit· 2004-05-12· cited 207×
- Blades v. Monsanto Co.Eighth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 203×
- In Re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, DebtorFourth Circuit· 1989-06-16· cited 193×
- Deiter v. Microsoft Corp.Fourth Circuit· 2006-02-07· cited 155×
- Richardson v. ByrdFifth Circuit· 1983-07-22· cited 135×
- The State Of Alabama v. Blue Bird Body CompanyFifth Circuit· 1978-05-22· cited 110×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.