In Re Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 523 only require a creditor to show that it “has a viable or colorable claim that its debt is non-dischargeable … and not to prove its claim on the merits.”
• creditor only has to show a viable or colorable claim under 523(a)(3)(B) else an extension of the limitations period of Rule 4007(c) would be created
• “debtor would have the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the debt was not a fraud class debt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Candidus
  E.D. New York· 2005-07-15· cited 16×
• Massa v. Addona (In re Massa)
  Second Circuit· 1999-08-10· cited 10×
• Matter of Johnson
  S.D. Georgia· 1996-05-22· cited 6×
• In re Gianopolous
  S.D. New York· 2018-03-15· cited 3×
• Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone Development Corp. v. Van Brackle Enterprises, Inc.
  New York Supreme Court· 2005-02-25· cited 1×
• In Re: Louis Paul Massa
  Second Circuit· 1999-08-10

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 162×
• Birkett v. Columbia Bank
  Supreme Court· 1904-11-28· cited 126×
• Milando v. Perrone
  Second Circuit· 1946-11-07· cited 63×
• Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.
  Supreme Court· 1905-01-30· cited 52×
• Lubeck v. Littlefield's Restaurant Corp. (In Re Fauchier)
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-03-19· cited 43×
• In Re Karamitsos
  S.D. Texas· 1988-07-19· cited 37×
• Matter of Zablocki
  D. Connecticut· 1984-01-26· cited 36×
• Haga v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Haga)
  W.D. Texas· 1991-07-24· cited 35×
• Ford v. Ford (In Re Ford)
  D. Oregon· 1993-08-05· cited 32×
• In Re Padilla
  D. Colorado· 1987-12-17· cited 32×
• La Bate & Conti, Inc. v. Davidson (In Re Davidson)
  D. New Jersey· 1983-11-14· cited 27×
• In Re Candelaria
  E.D. New York· 1990-11-15· cited 26×
• Robert S.C. Peterson, Inc. v. Anderson (In Re Anderson)
  D. Minnesota· 1987-04-17· cited 25×
• In Re Guzman
  W.D. Texas· 1991-07-24· cited 24×
• In Re Godley
  E.D. Virginia· 1986-05-29· cited 21×
• In re Barnes
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-07-31· cited 13×
• In Re Jensen
  E.D. New York· 1985-02-15· cited 12×
• In Re Xenerga, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2011-05-24· cited 12×
• Advent Mold, Inc. v. Walendy (In Re Walendy)
  C.D. California· 1990-08-17· cited 7×
• In Re Benham
  E.D. Arkansas· 1993-08-10· cited 7×