Skip to main content
D. Oregon· 8/5/1993

Ford v. Ford (In Re Ford)

Citations

  • 159 B.R. 590
  • 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 2000
  • 1993 WL 387326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • omission or false statement may be material if it is relevant to the discovery of past transactions — value of omitted assets does not have to be significant to be material and no detriment to creditors need be shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elizabeth L. Perris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.