Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 6/21/2000

In Re Thomas Harrison Provenzano

Citations

  • 215 F.3d 1233
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14352
  • 2000 WL 796749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that previously means “at least as late as the time of the filing of the first federal habeas petition”
  • “[Petitioner’s] innocence-of-the-death-penalty claim does not fit within either § 2244(b)(2) exception.”
  • “[Petitioner’s] innocence-of-the-death-penalty claim does not fit within either § 2244(b)(2) exception.”
  • “[A] competency to be executed claim not raised in the initial habeas petition is subject to the strictures of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), and [] such a claim cannot meet either of the exceptions set out in that provision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Cox, Edmondson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Thomas Harrison Provenzano

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.