In re: Tadd Vassell v.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering “preliminary question” of timeliness where movant’s “successive § 2255 motion [was] plainly [time-]barred as a matter of law”
• “Miller simply does no work for a nonhomicide offender . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).