In Re: Clarence Edward Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying Atkins -based second or successive application because it was filed more than a year after the Supreme Court decided Atkins
• denying Atkins- based second or successive application because it was filed more than a year after the Supreme Court decided Atkins
• denying Atkins-based second or successive application because it was filed more than a year after the Supreme Court decided Atkins
• court of appeals, having denied convicted capital murder defendant’s application for leave to file second or successive habeas petition as untimely, could not entertain defendant’s application for stay of execution; court’s jurisdiction ended with denial of the application
• court of appeals, having denied convicted capital murder defendant’s application for leave to file second or successive habeas petition as untimely, could not entertain defendant’s application for stay of execution; court’s jurisdiction ended with denial of the application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).