Eleventh Circuit· 1/24/2006

In Re: Clarence Edward Hill

Citations

437 F.3d 1080
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1665
2006 WL 163605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

denying Atkins -based second or successive application because it was filed more than a year after the Supreme Court decided Atkins
denying Atkins- based second or successive application because it was filed more than a year after the Supreme Court decided Atkins
denying Atkins-based second or successive application because it was filed more than a year after the Supreme Court decided Atkins
court of appeals, having denied convicted capital murder defendant’s application for leave to file second or successive habeas petition as untimely, could not entertain defendant’s application for stay of execution; court’s jurisdiction ended with denial of the application
court of appeals, having denied convicted capital murder defendant’s application for leave to file second or successive habeas petition as untimely, could not entertain defendant’s application for stay of execution; court’s jurisdiction ended with denial of the application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Tjoflat, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.