Supreme Court of Georgia· 9/30/2002
In re T. M. G.
Citations
- 275 Ga. 543
- 570 S.E.2d 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring for collateral estoppel “identity of the parties ... in both actions” and that same issue “actually [was] litigated and decided in the previous action” or “necessarily had to be decided in order for the previous judgment to have been rendered”
- requiring for collateral estoppel “identity of the parties . . . in both actions” and that same issue “actually [was] litigated and decided in the previous action” or “necessarily had to be decided in order for the previous judgment to have been rendered”
- only as to this Court’s conclusion that the Edmondsons “acted and were treated as parties” and were therefore bound by collateral estoppel
- \the re-adjudication of an issue that has previously been litigated and adjudicated on the merits in another action between the same parties or their privies\ is barred by collateral estoppel
- “the re-adjudication of an issue that has previously been litigated and adjudicated on the merits in another action between the same parties or their privies” is barred by collateral estoppel
- foster parents’ claim for adoption of child not barred because they were not a party to earlier adoption proceeding with different prospective parents, nor were their interests represented by the parties to that proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Community State Bank v. StrongEleventh Circuit· 2011-08-25· cited 141×
- Meagher v. QuickCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-12-11· cited 27×
- Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-09-20· cited 22×
- Haygood v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-09· cited 14×
- Williams v. the StatsSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-02-07· cited 14×
- Georgia Neurology & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. HillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-21· cited 11×
- Austin v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-06-29· cited 8×
- Owen v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-05· cited 6×
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-03-22· cited 5×
- SASTRE v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-09-23· cited 5×
- Pike County v. Callaway-IngramSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-04-29· cited 5×
- U. S. Micro Corp. v. Atlantix Global Systems, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-30· cited 4×
- East Georgia Land & Development Co. v. Newton CountySupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-03-19· cited 4×
- Smith v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-12-20· cited 3×
- Lifepine Roofing Partners v. BesserCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-01-26· cited 2×
- In Re TMGSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-09-30
- Community State Bank v. James StrongEleventh Circuit· 2011-08-25
- CAMDEN COUNTY v. SWEATT, JUDGESupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-02-07
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-10-24· cited 151×
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia· 1938-05-14· cited 71×
- Boozer v. HigdonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1984-03-14· cited 53×
- Department of Human Resources v. FleemanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-01-31· cited 29×
- Jebco Ventures, Inc. v. City of SmyrnaSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-11-09· cited 27×
- Roddenberry v. RoddenberrySupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-05-07· cited 27×
- Butler v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-19· cited 22×
- Lisle v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-10-23· cited 17×
- In Re StrohCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-20· cited 17×
- Jim West Housemovers v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-06-08· cited 8×
- In Re ALLAN G. STROH Et Al.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-09-11· cited 7×
- Edmondson v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-09-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.