Skip to main content

Boozer v. Higdon

Citations

  • 313 S.E.2d 100
  • 252 Ga. 276
  • 1984 Ga. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to prevail on a collateral estoppel claim, one must introduce sufficient parts of the prior record to “prove that the contested issues ... were actually litigated and decided and were necessary to the prior decision”
  • order showed that issue was raised in the prior proceeding, fully litigated, decided by a court with competent jurisdiction, and necessary to the final judgment
  • establishing the state preclusion requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.