Skip to main content
W.D. Pennsylvania· 2/21/2002

In Re Sweeney

Citations

  • 275 B.R. 730
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 295
  • 2002 WL 518331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendants did not have standing in bankruptcy simply because they have standing in state court action
  • defendant in state court litigation, who was not a creditor, lacked standing to oppose motion to reopen
  • “the Court will necessarily address the substance of the State Court Action Defendants’ objections to the granting of such relief notwithstanding such defendants’ lack of standing to press such objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernard Markovitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.