Skip to main content
· 1/14/1997

Donaldson v. Bernstein

Citations

  • 104 F.3d 547
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 521
  • 30 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding post-confirmation bankruptcy court jurisdiction where the debtors failed to fund the reorganization plan and failed to pay unsecured creditors as required by the plan
  • rejecting contention that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction on the ground that it was acting in a closed case when the court sua sponte reopened the case “for other cause”
  • “a confirmation order is res judicata as to all issues decided or which could have been decided at the hearing on confirmation”
  • “[W]e reject any contention that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction on the ground that it was acting in a closed case.”
  • debtors’ principals judicially estopped from asserting that one of them had terminated relationship with debtor because debtor did not disclose alleged resignation prior to bankruptcy court’s approval of plan of reorganization
  • debtors’ principals judicially estopped from asserting that one of them had terminated relationship with debtor because debtor did not disclose alleged resignation prior to bankruptcy court’s approval of plan of reorganization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.