In Re Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• calling section 707(b)(3) an “equitable test” as opposed to the “rigid, mechanical formula” in section 707(b)(2)
• describing section 707(b)(3) as “subjective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Crink
  M.D. North Carolina· 2009-03-18· cited 23×
• In Re Booker
  W.D. Missouri· 2009-01-23· cited 20×
• In Re Lorenca
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-01-29· cited 8×
• In Re Burggraf
  N.D. Ohio· 2010-08-09· cited 4×
• In re Lowe
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-12-29· cited 1×
• In re Norenberg
  D. Montana· 2016-07-21

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re: Danny Padilla, Debtor. William T. Neary, United States Trustee for Region 16 v. Danny Padilla
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-14· cited 166×
• Zolg v. Kelly (In re Kelly)
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-03-02· cited 130×
• In Re Nockerts
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-12-14· cited 80×
• In Re Thomas W. Price, Debtor, Thomas W. Price v. United States Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-01-07· cited 79×
• First USA v. Lamanna
  First Circuit· 1998-08-26· cited 74×
• In Re Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2006-10-13· cited 55×
• In Re Sorrell
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-01-26· cited 54×
• In Re Pak
  N.D. California· 2006-05-18· cited 50×
• In Re Ontiveros
  C.D. Illinois· 1996-06-18· cited 16×
• In Re Haar
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-06-04· cited 12×
• In Re Peoples
  N.D. Ohio· 2006-02-28· cited 4×