In Re Haar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “income made available to the [d]ebtors after they surrendered their residence may be considered when analyzing whether their case should be dismissed for abuse under the ‘totality of circumstances’ test”
• calling section 707(b)(3) an “equitable test” as opposed to the “rigid, mechanical formula” in section 707(b)(2)
• calling section 707(b)(3) an “equitable test” as opposed to the “rigid, mechanical formula” in section 707(b)(2)
• expenses for maintenance of two cars and cell phones for debtors’ adult daughters were not appropriate allocation of debtor’s financial resources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Kaminski
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-04-14· cited 22×
• In Re Perelman
  E.D. New York· 2009-10-30· cited 17×
• In Re Goble
  S.D. Ohio· 2009-02-17· cited 16×
• In Re Rivers
  M.D. Florida· 2012-03-12· cited 16×
• Reed v. Anderson
  C.D. California· 2009-11-24· cited 11×
• In Re Lorenca
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-01-29· cited 8×
• In Re Masella
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-07-20· cited 7×
• In Re Sullivan
  D. Montana· 2007-06-27· cited 6×
• In re Riggs
  W.D. Virginia· 2013-07-09· cited 5×
• In Re Zuccarell
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-07-09· cited 4×
• In re Lowe
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-12-29· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Toibb v. Radloff
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 500×
• In Re Charles Ellsworth Krohn AKA Charles E. Krohn, Appellant/debtor
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-09-21· cited 318×
• In Re William M. Behlke and Dina E. Behlke, Debtors, William M. Behlke and Dina E. Behlke v. Saul Eisen, United States Trustee
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-05-20· cited 179×
• In Re Nockerts
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-12-14· cited 80×
• United States Trustee v. Cortez
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-07-20· cited 79×
• Amoco Rocmount Co. v. Anschutz Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-09-13· cited 73×
• In Re Lenton
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-12-15· cited 63×
• In Re Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2006-10-13· cited 55×
• In Re Henebury
  S.D. Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 50×
• In Re Mestemaker
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-01-10· cited 49×
• In Re Haar
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-02-20· cited 42×
• In Re Pier
  N.D. Ohio· 2004-02-20· cited 38×
• In Re Wright
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-03-22· cited 19×
• In Re McUne
  D. Oregon· 2006-12-19· cited 7×
• In Re Peoples
  N.D. Ohio· 2006-02-28· cited 4×