D. Nevada· 7/19/2011
In Re Stanton
Citations
- 457 B.R. 80
- 2011 WL 2940707
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he state in which the debtor’s domicile has been located for the 730 days immediately preceding the date of the filing of the petition provides the applicable slate of exemptions. The key concept is ‘domicile.’”
- “[T]he state in which the debtor’s domicile has been located for the 730 days immediately preceding the date of the filing of the petition provides the applicable slate of exemptions. The key concept is ‘domicile.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruce A. Markell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kramer ex rel. estate of Chin v. Chin (In re Chin)E.D. New York· 2013-06-04· cited 25×
- Rose v. Reaves (In re Rose)D. Arizona· 2017-05-03· cited 6×
- McFarland v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re International Manufacturing Group, Inc.)E.D. California· 2015-09-10· cited 6×
- In re TarkanianD. Nevada· 2014-06-30· cited 2×
- Curt Ranta v. Marc KrigsmanTenth Circuit· 2025-09-03
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2001-09-24· cited 409×
- Schwab v. ReillySupreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 289×
- HBE Leasing Corp. v. FrankSecond Circuit· 1995-01-18· cited 234×
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)D. Utah· 1987-07-23· cited 191×
- Atlanta Shipping Corporation, Inc. v. Chemical BankSecond Circuit· 1987-04-29· cited 145×
- 24 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1414, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,841 Max Sugarman Funeral Home, Inc. v. A.D.B. InvestorsFirst Circuit· 1991-02-28· cited 140×
- Greene v. SavageNinth Circuit· 2009-10-02· cited 100×
- Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court· 1933-04-10· cited 94×
- Myers v. MatleySupreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 92×
- Addison v. SeaverEighth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 79×
- Orr v. Kinderhill Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-03-16· cited 65×
- Pereira v. Checkmate Communications Co. (In Re Checkmate Stereo & Electronics, Ltd.)E.D. New York· 1981-02-05· cited 63×
- Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. Burnazos, Boston Trading Group, Inc. v. Robert A. BurnazosFirst Circuit· 1988-02-02· cited 61×
- Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.S.D. New York· 2003-03-14· cited 57×
- Voest-Alpine Trading USA Corp. v. Vantage Steel Corp.Third Circuit· 1990-11-13· cited 53×
- Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Swegan (In Re Swegan)Sixth Circuit· 2008-03-19· cited 52×
- Atlanta Shipping Corp., Inc. v. Chemical BankS.D. New York· 1986-03-26· cited 52×
- Pirrone v. Toboroff (In Re Vaniman International, Inc.)E.D. New York· 1982-07-13· cited 46×
- In Re SissomS.D. Texas· 2007-05-11· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.