Skip to main content

In Re Spears

Citations

  • 157 Cal. App. 3d 1203
  • 204 Cal. Rptr. 333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “petitioner has adequately explained his delay as attributable to his lack of capacity to represent himself . . . and the scarcity of chan- nels through which legal assistance is available to indigent prisoners”
  • noting that although an insufficiency of the evidence claim is not a cognizable habeas claim, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failure to raise sufficiency of the evidence is a cognizable habeas claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trotter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Spears

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.