Supreme Court· 11/13/1989
In re Sparks
Citations
- 493 U.S. 963
- 110 S. Ct. 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that results of polygraph test proffered by defendant were inadmissable at the guilt phase and the sentencing phase of a capital murder trial
- holding term \deliberately\ sufficiently clear to permit jury to decide the first Texas capital sentencing special issue
- potential jurors who indicate they would automatically vote for the death penalty for every eligible defendant must be excluded when challenged for cause
- \A veniremember who believes that the death penalty should automatically be imposed in every capital case should be excused.\
- potential jurors who indicated they would automatically vote for death penalty for every eligible defendant must be excluded *Page 476 when challenged for cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
158 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kuenzel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-06-29· cited 336×
- James D. Koch v. Steve W. Puckett, Superintendent of Mississippi State PenitentiaryFifth Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 322×
- West v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1996-08-21· cited 218×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-11-01· cited 201×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-07-08· cited 199×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 196×
- Coral v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-03-27· cited 196×
- Amos v. ScottFifth Circuit· 1995-08-08· cited 194×
- Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-05-05· cited 189×
- Haney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-06-28· cited 188×
- Dill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-05-31· cited 180×
- Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-01-30· cited 160×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-10-01· cited 155×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-09-20· cited 152×
- Ex Parte DillSupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-03-13· cited 148×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-11-16· cited 148×
- Ex Parte RieberSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-05-19· cited 146×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 144×
- Andrews v. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1994-05-12· cited 133×
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-03-26· cited 129×
Other cases named In re Sparks
27 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re SparksFifth Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 44×
- In Re SparksS.D. Ohio· 2006-07-26· cited 40×
- In Re SparksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1936-11-20· cited 28×
- In Re SparksE.D. Texas· 2006-10-18· cited 17×
- In Re SparksN.D. Illinois· 1996-01-18· cited 13×
- In Re SparksN.D. Illinois· 1994-09-14· cited 9×
- In Re SparksM.D. Florida· 2006-10-05· cited 4×
- In Re SparksS.D. Ohio· 2009-07-22· cited 3×
- In re SparksW.D. Oklahoma· 1938-03-26· cited 2×
- In Re SparksNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1944-03-05· cited 1×
- In re SparksN.D. Alabama· 1969-11-26· cited 1×
- In Re SparksN.D. Illinois· 1995-04-13
- In Re SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29
- In Re SparksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-28
- In re SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-16
- In re SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-16
- In re SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-16
- In re SparksE.D. Tennessee· 1924-09-24
- In re SparksSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-10-16
- In re SparksSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-05-14
- In re SparksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-09-03
- In re SparksMontana Supreme Court· 1958-02-14
- In re SparksS.D. Ohio· 2018-08-17
- In re SparksSupreme Court· 1989-10-16
- In re SparksSupreme Court· 1989-10-16
- In re SparksSupreme Court· 1989-11-13
- In re SparksOhio Circuit Courts· 1910-03-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.