In Re Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It also would not be appropriate to split a claim for eligibility purposes if that claim must be treated as fully secured at confirmation.”
• “Where a trust deed is partially secured on a debtor’s primary residence, that debt will be counted as secured debt for § 109(e) purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re De La Hoz
  M.D. Florida· 2011-05-05· cited 8×
• In re Sandrin
  D. Colorado· 2015-08-28· cited 8×
• In Re Munoz
  S.D. California· 2010-01-12· cited 4×
• In re Blackwell
  N.D. California· 2014-06-30· cited 2×
• In re Garcia
  D. New Mexico· 2014-10-03· cited 2×
• In re Krueger
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2015-04-07

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dewsnup v. Timm
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
• Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
• In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 151×
• In Re: Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis, Debtors. Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis v. Christen Brun Henrichsen
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 151×
• In Re Sieglinde M. Zimmer, Debtor, Sieglinde M. Zimmer v. Psb Lending Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-12-24· cited 124×
• Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam)
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-03· cited 90×
• In Re: James P. Slack, Debtor. James P. Slack v. Wilshire Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 63×
• Robert Miller v. United States of America, Acting Through the Farmers Home Administration
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-07-03· cited 38×
• In Re Toronto
  D. Connecticut· 1994-03-31· cited 35×
• Soderlund v. Cohen (In Re Soderlund)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-06-28· cited 31×
• Guastella v. Hampton (In Re Guastella)
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-04-11· cited 14×
• In Re Prosper
  D. Connecticut· 1994-06-29· cited 11×
• In Re 1441 Veteran Street Co., Debtor. Gold Coast Asset Acquisition, L.P. v. 1441 Veteran Street Co., and Levene & Eisenberg
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-07-15· cited 10×