Guastella v. Hampton (In Re Guastella)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying good 27 faith exception and looking beyond schedules to determine that 28 debtor improperly listed debt at $0 for eligibility purposes
• applying good 27 faith exception and looking beyond schedules to determine that 28 debtor improperly listed debt at $0 for eligibility purposes
• “The [creditors] had a ‘claim,’ and that claim was a ‘debt’ within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, even though the State Court had not yet reduced the claim to final judgment when [the debtor] filed her petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).