E.D. Pennsylvania· 2/14/1990

In Re Smith

Citations

111 B.R. 81
1990 Bankr. LEXIS 276
1989 WL 168712

Judges: David A. Scholl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.
Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 665×
Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.
Third Circuit· 1986-04-14· cited 402×
Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen Division
Third Circuit· 1987-12-14· cited 264×
Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. Lingle
Third Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 220×
Dura Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Business Corporation, in 89-3005 v. Rothbury Investments, Ltd., a Canadian Corporation, in 89-3023
Third Circuit· 1989-10-16· cited 48×
Schering Corp. v. Vitarine Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Third Circuit· 1989-11-14· cited 29×
In Re Geller
E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-06-18· cited 24×
In Re Arena
E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-01-25· cited 22×
In Re Geller
E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-02-24· cited 14×
In Re Green
E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-08-08· cited 13×
Van Huderson v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Van Huderson)
E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-02-16· cited 11×
In Re Taylor
D. Colorado· 1989-05-09· cited 11×
In Re Richardson
N.D. Illinois· 1988-05-06· cited 9×
In Re Lopez Rodriguez
D. Puerto Rico· 1987-07-10· cited 6×
In Re Ashton
S.D. Ohio· 1988-07-21· cited 5×
Haardt v. Funk (In Re Haardt)
E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-09-02· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.