In Re Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that local water and sewer district’s environmental clean-up claim was liquidated because, under governing New Hampshire statute, claim is “based upon actual costs ... [that] can be readily determined with precision through simple arithmetic computation”
• “Eligibility for chapter 13 is not based upon postpetition events such as allowed claims, filed claims, or treatment of claims in a confirmed chapter 13 plan.”
• “Eligibility for chapter 13 is not based upon postpetition events such as allowed claims, filed claims, or treatment of claims in a confirmed chapter 13 plan.”
• amount of claim asserted by the State of New Hampshire arising from debtors’ improper disposal of hazardous waste was not readily ascertainable because, under the controlling state statute, a court would be required to exercise discretion to determine the appropriate penalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• De Jounghe v. Mender (In Re De Jounghe)
  First Circuit· 2005-12-12· cited 31×
• In Re Marrama
  D. Massachusetts· 2006-07-14· cited 14×
• In re Rios
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-08-21· cited 8×
• In Re Smith
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-02-12· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 151×
• In Re: Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis, Debtors. Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis v. Christen Brun Henrichsen
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 151×
• Sylvester v. Dow Jones & Co. (In Re Sylvester)
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-09· cited 86×
• In the Matter of Frank E. KNIGHT, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-05-03· cited 83×
• United States v. Verdunn
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 69×
• In Re: James P. Slack, Debtor. James P. Slack v. Wilshire Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 63×
• Soderlund v. Cohen (In Re Soderlund)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-06-28· cited 31×
• Bagley v. Controlled Environment Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-01-06· cited 31×
• In Re Clark
  D. Colorado· 1988-10-14· cited 13×
• In Re Vaughn
  D. New Hampshire· 2002-04-05· cited 6×