Skip to main content

In Re Smith

Citations

  • 989 P.2d 165
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5540
  • 1999 Colo. LEXIS 1006
  • 1999 WL 782055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a hearing board did not abuse its discretion by limiting a party’s ability to cross-examine witnesses as a sanction for his failure to comply with his discovery obligations
  • emphasizing the need to protect those reporting attorney misconduct from abusive process in the form of retaliatory lawsuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kourlis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.