Supreme Court of Colorado· 10/4/1999
In Re Smith
Citations
- 989 P.2d 165
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5540
- 1999 Colo. LEXIS 1006
- 1999 WL 782055
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a hearing board did not abuse its discretion by limiting a party’s ability to cross-examine witnesses as a sanction for his failure to comply with his discovery obligations
- emphasizing the need to protect those reporting attorney misconduct from abusive process in the form of retaliatory lawsuits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kourlis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-07-12· cited 194×
- People ex rel. N.A.T.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-03-09· cited 39×
- Morgan & Pottinger, Attorneys, P.S.C. v. BottsKentucky Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 31×
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 2007-01-12· cited 27×
- In Re the Marriage of GanceColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-03-29· cited 17×
- Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2001-06-28· cited 16×
- In Re RaspantiSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-03-17· cited 12×
- Mishkin v. YoungColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-10-02· cited 9×
- Blair v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-07-29· cited 5×
- Carson v. PaineWebber, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-02-28· cited 5×
- Tucker v. TuckerMontana Supreme Court· 2014-04-29· cited 3×
- Colvin v. GiguereUtah Supreme Court· 2014-06-20· cited 3×
- Kimball v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-08-04· cited 1×
- People v. ALBANISupreme Court of Colorado· 2011-06-07· cited 1×
- America First Credit Union v. Department of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2001-09-20· cited 1×
- People v. HarperSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-09-21· cited 1×
- D.A.R. v. R.E.L.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2018-09-07· cited 1×
- People v. RASURESupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-05-30
- People Ex Rel. JcsColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-10-15
- People Ex Rel. NatColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-03-09
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court· 1972-01-13· cited 1,621×
- In Re David L. SmithTenth Circuit· 1993-11-29· cited 310×
- Hardy W. Ryland and Alma Odessa Ryland v. Alfred B. Shapiro, Edwin O. Ware and Edward E. Roberts, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1983-07-05· cited 303×
- Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1907-11-18· cited 280×
- National Surety Co. v. State BankEighth Circuit· 1903-02-02· cited 139×
- Steven Richards Nordgren, Douglas Yoakam, Ray Dodge and John C. Bolsinger v. William MillikenTenth Circuit· 1985-05-20· cited 67×
- Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1955-05-02· cited 54×
- Floyd F. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1987-08-19· cited 41×
- Klein v. Collard & Roe, Inc.Supreme Court· 1996-10-07· cited 22×
- Ellis Rader v. Melvin CliburnSixth Circuit· 1973-03-28· cited 19×
- McKnight v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 18×
- In Re David L. SmithTenth Circuit· 1996-02-13· cited 16×
- In Re QuiatSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-04-26· cited 15×
- People v. FitzgibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-01-22· cited 14×
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-05-26· cited 11×
- Nelmida v. Shelly Eurocars, Inc.Supreme Court· 1997-10-06· cited 11×
- People v. StaufferSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-09-07· cited 10×
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado· 1997-03-03· cited 8×
- People v. DaltonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-09· cited 4×
- In re SmithSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.