People v. Fitzgibbons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the respondent filed no affidavit, but the hearing board reached the merits of the case and the court would do likewise
• finding the conclusions of the district court and court of appeals were evidence that the respondent's claims were frivolous and groundless
• finding the conclusions of the district court and court of appeals were evidence that the respondent’s claims were frivolous and groundless
• due to differing burdens of proof, a determination of frivolousness under C.A.R. 38(d) is not collateral in a later disciplinary proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).