Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/30/1994
In re S.M.
Citations
- 163 Vt. 136
- 655 A.2d 726
- 1994 Vt. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining two-step analysis for modifying disposition orders based on changed circumstances and best interests of child
- reversing denial of termination petition and directing family court to hold new disposition hearing on remand to allow court to consider parents’ current circumstances
- “If the improvement does not substantially conform with the established expectations, then the court may find a change of circumstances.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Gibson, Johnson, Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re B.W.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-01· cited 79×
- In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
- In re M.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-15· cited 35×
- In re D. P.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-28· cited 34×
- In re D.B.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-10· cited 24×
- In re H.S.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-10-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.