Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/15/1993
In re M.M.
Citations
- 159 Vt. 517
- 621 A.2d 1276
- 1993 Vt. LEXIS 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, although parent had recently made “some progress,” the trial court had properly “elevate[d] the best interests of the dependent child” where parent’s progress was “insufficient . . . and [the] ability to act independently is many months away”
- stating that most important statutory factor is likelihood of parent resuming parental duties within reasonable time
- noting that “the changed circumstances test is met when the findings in the case are replete with facts sufficient to meet the required standard” (quotation omitted)
- requiring two-step analysis examining changed circumstances and children’s best interests in determining whether to terminate parental rights
- upholding finding that mother’s progress toward reunification had stagnated, despite “some improvement,” where it was insufficient and her ability to independently parent the child was months away
- upholding finding that mother’s progress toward reunification had stagnated, despite “some improvement,” where it was insufficient and her ability to independently parent the child was months away
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Gibson, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-03-19· cited 150×
- In re B.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-07-05· cited 101×
- In re J.B.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-27· cited 93×
- In re B.W.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-01· cited 79×
- In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-03-28· cited 62×
- In re J.T.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-10· cited 53×
- In re T.T.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-02-22· cited 28×
- Abbiati v. Buttura & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-01-31· cited 22×
- In re C.H.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-01-14· cited 19×
- In re F.P.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-08-11· cited 10×
- In re Cr.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-05-12· cited 9×
- In re A.W.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-12-08· cited 7×
- In re S.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-12-30· cited 5×
- In Re MMSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-15
- In Re BWSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-01
- In Re JBSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-27
- In Re AFSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-03-19
- In Re JTSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-10
- In Re BSSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-03-28
- In Re BMSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-07-05
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-03· cited 64×
- In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
- In re L.A.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-30· cited 32×
- In re C.L. & H.L.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 31×
- In re J.H.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-02-01· cited 17×
- In re R.W.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-02-26· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.