Skip to main content

In re M.M.

Citations

  • 159 Vt. 517
  • 621 A.2d 1276
  • 1993 Vt. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although parent had recently made “some progress,” the trial court had properly “elevate[d] the best interests of the dependent child” where parent’s progress was “insufficient . . . and [the] ability to act independently is many months away”
  • stating that most important statutory factor is likelihood of parent resuming parental duties within reasonable time
  • noting that “the changed circumstances test is met when the findings in the case are replete with facts sufficient to meet the required standard” (quotation omitted)
  • requiring two-step analysis examining changed circumstances and children’s best interests in determining whether to terminate parental rights
  • upholding finding that mother’s progress toward reunification had stagnated, despite “some improvement,” where it was insufficient and her ability to independently parent the child was months away
  • upholding finding that mother’s progress toward reunification had stagnated, despite “some improvement,” where it was insufficient and her ability to independently parent the child was months away

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Dooley, Gibson, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.