In re S.M.
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4654
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err by granting permanent custody of a child to a children services agency where appellant had abandoned her child and the child's best interests were served by granting permanent custody to the children services agency due to the uncertainty surrounding appellant's housing, employment, frequent incarceration, and untreated mental health issues.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 81×
- In re D.K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 80×
- In re G.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 72×
- In re M.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 64×
- In re K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-19· cited 63×
- In re T.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-11· cited 62×
- In re C.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-04· cited 53×
- In re N.R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-16· cited 48×
- In re D.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 43×
- In re J.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-30· cited 29×
- In re B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-09· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.