Skip to main content

In re R.B.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1705

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err by denying appellant's motion to dismiss a children service agency's complaints alleging her two children were abused and dependent children because the juvenile court did not hold its disposition hearings for either child within the 90-day timeframe set forth by the now former R.C. 2151.35(B)(1) as such failure does not divest the juvenile court of subject matter jurisdiction and appellant's argument was barred by res judicata given her failure to raise such a challenge on appeal from the juvenile court's dispositional decisions granting temporary custody of both children to the children services agency. The juvenile court also did not err by granting permanent custody of appellant's two children to a children service agency where the record provided sufficient credible evidence to support the juvenile court's decision finding it was in the children's best interest to grant permanent custody of both children to the children service agency. This included evidence that both chi

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.