In Re Siegel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘“[Exemption law must be liberally construed to preserve the exemption.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1998-03-18· cited 44×
• Pruss v. Butler (In Re Pruss)
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-06-08· cited 12×
• In Re Aurelio
  N.D. Mississippi· 2000-04-26· cited 2×
• Marion F. Pruss v. Richard Butler
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-06-08

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Goldberg
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1986-03-31· cited 21×
• Matter of Knight
  S.D. Iowa· 1987-06-30· cited 11×
• Kirksey v. Rowe
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1902-03-11· cited 11×
• Lindsay v. U.S. Bank (In Re Lindsay)
  D. Oregon· 1983-04-01· cited 10×
• Terry v. McDaniel
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1899-11-03· cited 10×
• Kay Bank N. A. v. Duchesne (In Re Duchesne)
  N.D. New York· 1982-03-30· cited 9×
• In Re Lawrence
  E.D. Tennessee· 1997-01-14· cited 8×
• In Re Neal
  W.D. Texas· 1992-03-08· cited 8×
• In Re Page
  D. Rhode Island· 1991-07-31· cited 2×
• First National Bank of Pinellas v. Guard (In Re Guard)
  M.D. Florida· 1982-10-13· cited 1×
• In Re Carson
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1995-07-28· cited 1×
• In re Bannon
  D. Idaho· 1990-07-18· cited 1×