In Re Lawrence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading Kokoszka more narrowly; holding debtor’s earnings exempt under Missouri garnishment statute
• a state statute patterned after §§ 1672 and 1673 of the CCPA is not a state exemption statute, but rather only regulates the process of one form of execution, garnishment of earnings in 6 Section 522(b)(2)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1998-03-18· cited 44×
• Pruss v. Butler (In Re Pruss)
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-06-08· cited 12×
• Yaden v. Osworth (In Re Osworth)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-04-19· cited 9×
• In Re Siegel
  W.D. Tennessee· 1997-10-24· cited 6×
• In Re Irish
  N.D. Iowa· 2003-12-03· cited 2×
• In re Wiener
  N.D. Ohio· 2001-11-05· cited 2×
• Marion F. Pruss v. Richard Butler
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-06-08