Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/27/2013
In re S.G.
Citations
- 828 N.W.2d 118
- 2013 WL 1222852
- 2013 Minn. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining to “consider” as “to think carefully and form an opinion about,” and “preference,” as “[the] select[ion of] . . . someone or something over another or others”
- affirming denial of grandparents’ motion for adoptive placement where district court found “there is a real risk of future emotional and developmental damage if the children are removed from the foster parents’ home” (quotation omitted)
- discussing the relative-placement preference in the adoption context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Gildea, Paul, Stras, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-24· cited 367×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 253×
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-05-05· cited 57×
- In Re the Welfare of D.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-06-12· cited 30×
- In Re the Welfare of M.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-03-02· cited 25×
- Jordet v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-01-11· cited 21×
- In re Petition to Adopt S.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-11· cited 12×
- National Hells Canyon Association, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Idaho Power Company, IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1956-11-16· cited 10×
- In Re the Adoption of C.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-10-31· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.