Skip to main content
· 10/31/1996

In Re the Adoption of C.H.

Citations

  • 554 N.W.2d 737
  • 1996 Minn. LEXIS 752
  • 1996 WL 628203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving best-interests factor analysis of application of biological family preference to resolve competing adoption petitions between foster parents and biological relatives
  • approving best-interests factor analysis of application of biological family preference to resolve competing adoption petitions between foster parents and biological relatives
  • upholding the district court’s decision where the court’s “detailed findings of fact [were] well substantiated by the evidence and thoroughly supported] its conclusion”
  • “[T]he [relative] preference is not to be applied so as to override the overall best interests of the child.”
  • \[T]he [relative] preference is not to be applied so as to override the overall best interests of the child.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne, Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.