In re S.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]n general, all information that may be helpful in determining the disposition of a CHINS child may be admitted and relied upon during a disposition hearing,” including hearsay evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of Carlita B.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 290×
• State v. Lipka
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-11-01· cited 51×
• State v. Vuley
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-02-08· cited 19×
• State v. Onorato
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-17· cited 14×
• State v. Goodnow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-05-27· cited 13×
• In re M.M. and C.M., Juveniles
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-10-02· cited 13×
• In Re SG
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-12
• State v. Devan Calabrese
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-10-01

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re J. M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1973-12-04· cited 57×
• In re M. B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-28· cited 51×
• In re R.M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-05-27· cited 41×
• In re R.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-04· cited 36×
• In re D. P.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-28· cited 34×
• In re R. L.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-06-26· cited 32×
• In re C.L. & H.L.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 31×
• State v. Derouchie
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-10-20· cited 23×
• In re Y. B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-09-06· cited 23×
• In Interest of AMA
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 21×
• In Re Schmeltzer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-03-03· cited 10×
• In the Interest of S.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-25· cited 6×