Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/26/1987

In re R. L.

Citations

  • 148 Vt. 223
  • 531 A.2d 909
  • 1987 Vt. LEXIS 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “parents’ failure to object to the introduction of hearsay at the disposition hearing served as a waiver of their claim that its use at that hearing was error”
  • holding that “parents’ failure to object to the introduction of hearsay at the disposition hearing served as a waiver of their claim that its use at that hearing was error”
  • holding that failure to raise objection below waives claim on appeal
  • holding that failure to raise objection below waives claim on appeal
  • holding “parents’ failure to object to the introduction of hearsay at the disposition hearing served as a waiver of their claim that its use at that hearing was error”
  • declining to address parents’ claim that trial court improperly relied on hearsay at disposition where parents did not object to introduction of testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Hayes, Hill, Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re R. L.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.