In Re Senate Joint Resolution 2G

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]everal of the opponents observe that the Joint Resolution is nothing more than a gerrymandering effort by the Democratic majority of the legislature to protect Democratic incumbents. We have little doubt that politics played a large part in the adoption of this plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. De Grandy
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,107×
• Lawyer v. Department of Justice
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 50×
• DeGrandy v. Wetherell
  N.D. Florida· 1992-05-29· cited 36×
• In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-03-09· cited 36×
• Parella v. Montalbano
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2006-06-09· cited 35×
• Johnson v. Mortham
  N.D. Florida· 1996-06-06· cited 25×
• The League of Women Voters of Florida, etc. v. Ken Detzner Opinion
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-07-09· cited 22×
• In Re Constitutionality of Resolution 1987
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-05-03· cited 21×
• De Grandy v. Wetherell
  N.D. Florida· 1992-07-17· cited 18×
• Florida House of Representatives v. League of Women Voters of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-07-11· cited 12×
• In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 2-B
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-04-27· cited 11×
• In Re Constitutionality of Senate J. Res.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-06-25· cited 10×
• Florida Department of State v. Florida State Conference of Naacp Branches
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-08-31· cited 8×
• League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-12-02· cited 6×
• In Re Const. of House Joint Resolution 25e
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-12-04· cited 3×
• Holliday Amusement Company Of Charleston, Incorporated v. State Of South Carolina
  Fourth Circuit· 2005-03-23· cited 2×
• Holliday Amusement Co. of Charleston, Inc. v. South Carolina
  Fourth Circuit· 2005-03-23· cited 1×
• (2000)
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2000-07-10
• Parella v. Irons, 02-4578 (2003)
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2003-10-08

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reynolds v. Sims
  Supreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
• Thornburg v. Gingles
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,221×
• Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. Rose
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 1,197×
• City of Mobile v. Bolden
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 783×
• Connor v. Finch
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 363×
• Brown v. Thomson
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 283×
• Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-07· cited 94×
• Jeffers v. Clinton
  E.D. Arkansas· 1990-01-26· cited 74×
• Henry T. McMillan v. Escambia County, Florida, Elmer Jenkins v. City of Pensacola, Henry T. McMillan v. Escambia County, Florida
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-12-19· cited 70×
• Armour v. State of Ohio
  N.D. Ohio· 1991-09-27· cited 69×
• Solomon v. Liberty County
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-04-05· cited 42×
• Turner v. State of Ark.
  E.D. Arkansas· 1991-11-15· cited 41×
• Tallahassee Branch of Naacp v. Leon County, Florida
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-09-21· cited 31×
• Mader v. Crowell
  M.D. Tennessee· 1980-03-27· cited 19×
• Republican Party of Virginia v. Wilder
  W.D. Virginia· 1991-09-10· cited 16×
• In Re Apportionment Law, Etc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-05-12· cited 16×
• James v. City of Sarasota, Fla.
  M.D. Florida· 1985-05-24· cited 12×
• Milton v. Smathers
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-30· cited 4×