Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 10/27/1995

In Re Sealed Case

Citations

  • 67 F.3d 965
  • 314 U.S. App. D.C. 271
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30813
  • 1995 WL 627906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the standard of care owed by a consulting physician extends \only to the careful performance of the duties outlined by the contractual agreement\
  • concluding as a matter of law that the standard of care owed by the consulting physician extended “only to the careful performance of the duties outlined by the contractual agreement”
  • concluding as a matter of law that the standard of care owed by the consulting physician extended \only to the careful performance of the duties outlined by the contractual agreement\
  • “The existence of ... a legal duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, is a question of law, to be determined by the court.”
  • \We have not found any District of Columbia cases describing the duty owed to a patient by a consulting physician in a contractual relationship with the patient's regular doctor....\
  • “The existence of ... a legal duty owed by thq defendant to the plaintiff! ] ⅛ a question of law, to be determined by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Wald, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.