Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 6/1/2007

In Re: Sealed Case

Citations

  • 488 F.3d 1011
  • 376 U.S. App. D.C. 315
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12639
  • 2007 WL 1574599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing all of the counts defendant would have faced had he chosen to go to trial
  • analyzing all of the counts defendant would have faced had he chosen to go to trial
  • Hill inquiry into whether defendant would have gone to trial is necessarily informed by the defendant’s likelihood of success at trial
  • “We therefore turn directly to the question of whether the defendant suffered prejudice due to his counsel’s deficient performance.”
  • “We therefore turn directly to the question of whether the defendant, suffered prejudice due to his counsel’s deficient performance.”
  • defendant “failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial” where, if Nonprecedential Memo Op: 322 Or App 527 (2022

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Brown, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.