D.C. Circuit· 6/1/2007
In Re: Sealed Case
Citations
- 488 F.3d 1011
- 376 U.S. App. D.C. 315
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12639
- 2007 WL 1574599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing all of the counts defendant would have faced had he chosen to go to trial
- analyzing all of the counts defendant would have faced had he chosen to go to trial
- Hill inquiry into whether defendant would have gone to trial is necessarily informed by the defendant’s likelihood of success at trial
- “We therefore turn directly to the question of whether the defendant suffered prejudice due to his counsel’s deficient performance.”
- “We therefore turn directly to the question of whether the defendant, suffered prejudice due to his counsel’s deficient performance.”
- defendant “failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial” where, if Nonprecedential Memo Op: 322 Or App 527 (2022
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Brown, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. PettifordD.C. Circuit· 2008-02-26· cited 49×
- United States v. MejiaD.C. Circuit· 2010-03-30· cited 42×
- Boyd v. WaymartThird Circuit· 2009-07-31· cited 42×
- United States v. Byron McDadeD.C. Circuit· 2012-11-09· cited 34×
- United States v. PollardDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-16· cited 31×
- United States v. CurryD.C. Circuit· 2007-07-31· cited 29×
- United States v. Kerry NewmanD.C. Circuit· 2015-11-17· cited 26×
- United States v. BerkeleyD.C. Circuit· 2009-06-09· cited 20×
- United States v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-24· cited 13×
- United States v. BertramDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-19· cited 8×
- United States v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-07· cited 7×
- United States v. WrightDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-12· cited 6×
- United States v. FelderDistrict of Columbia· 2008-06-24· cited 5×
- United States v. ZaitarD.C. Circuit· 2015-12-22· cited 4×
- United States v. TalbottD.C. Circuit· 2017-12-19· cited 3×
- United States v. OladokunDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-29· cited 2×
- United States v. RobertsDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-02· cited 1×
- United States v. WrightD.C. Circuit· 2011-08-04· cited 1×
- United States v. AgramonteD.C. Circuit· 2008-11-20· cited 1×
- United States v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia· 2009-02-10
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- United States v. Crowder, Rochelle A.D.C. Circuit· 1998-05-01· cited 108×
- United States v. Cassell, DwayneD.C. Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 98×
- Terrick Alfred Williams v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 2006-06-27· cited 93×
- United States v. Andre HorneD.C. Circuit· 1993-03-19· cited 86×
- United States v. Toms, RonaldD.C. Circuit· 2005-02-01· cited 79×
- United States v. McCoy, MichaelD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-23· cited 54×
- United States v. Douglas, DeonD.C. Circuit· 2007-04-13· cited 53×
- United States v. Watson, Talib D.D.C. Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 51×
- United States v. Hanson, JamalD.C. Circuit· 2003-08-19· cited 42×
- United States v. Molina-UribeFifth Circuit· 2005-10-26· cited 36×
- United States v. Andre WatleyD.C. Circuit· 1993-03-19· cited 28×
- United States v. Michael Jonathan BoozeD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-06· cited 12×
- Sealed v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-11-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.