In re S.D.S.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3273
Syllabus
Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated a delinquent child for committing acts which, were he an adult, would have constituted the crimes of felonious assault and aggravated menacing. The State presented sufficient evidence to support the adjudication, and the adjudication was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's motion for a new trial or to allow reopening of appellant's case for the presentation of additional evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 833×
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court· 1989-08-09· cited 190×
- State v. GreenOhio Supreme Court· 1991-04-03· cited 89×
- State v. HartmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 57×
- State v. WinbushOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 55×
- State v. FarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 39×
- State v. HammadOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-22· cited 26×
- State v. GrundsteinOhio Court of Appeals· 1943-03-23· cited 8×
- State v. PelfreyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.