Skip to main content

In re S.D.S.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3273

Syllabus

Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated a delinquent child for committing acts which, were he an adult, would have constituted the crimes of felonious assault and aggravated menacing. The State presented sufficient evidence to support the adjudication, and the adjudication was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's motion for a new trial or to allow reopening of appellant's case for the presentation of additional evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.