In re S.D.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1645
Syllabus
DUE PROCESS – NOTICE – CUSTODY: The juvenile court erred by neither taking additional evidence on the merits of the magistrate's custody decision nor returning the matter to the magistrate and overruling mother's objection that she did not receive notice of the custody hearing date when mother established that the court did not send notice by mail and the magistrate only gave the date for the custody hearing a single time during a remote pretrial hearing.
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- In re ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-10· cited 70×
- State v. A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-28· cited 17×
- Bohannon v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-13· cited 15×
- In re M.W. ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-20· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.