In Re Screws Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “reluctance” to expansively define a predecessor relationship “is justified”
• \reluctance\ to expansively define a predecessor relationship \is justified\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beeler v. Downey
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-11-12· cited 114×
• United States v. Richard Feldman and Richard Martenson
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-05-03· cited 43×
• Acord v. Pettit
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-14· cited 21×
• Creamer v. General Teamsters Local Union 326
  D. Delaware· 1983-03-23· cited 8×
• Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
  W.D. Virginia· 1994-11-23· cited 5×
• West Virginia Ex Rel. McGraw v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
  W.D. Virginia· 1994-11-25· cited 3×
• Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades
  S.D. New York· 1989-12-06· cited 3×
• Eddie E. Acord, et ux v. Britton K. Pettit, et ux
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-09-29· cited 105×
• Lloyd v. American Export Lines, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1978-06-22· cited 68×
• Jakob v. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery
  Supreme Court· 1978-11-13· cited 55×
• In re Master Key Antitrust Litigation
  D. Connecticut· 1976-08-17· cited 10×
• In Re IBM Peripheral Edp Devices, Etc.
  N.D. California· 1978-01-13· cited 6×