United States v. Richard Feldman and Richard Martenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] court must evaluate not only the similarity of the issues, but also the purpose for which the testimony is given.”
• “[S]tatements are [constitutionally] admissible even where there was no cross-examination if it is clear (1) that the declarant actually made the statement in question; and (2) there is circumstantial evidence supporting its veracity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).